51茶馆

November 7, 2019

PhD graduate examines how marketing influences children’s junk food habits

Dr Jennifer Norman advocating for greater government action on food advertising

You can lead a child to junk food, and they will certainly eat it, according to research conducted by Dr Jenny Norman, a PhD graduate from the Faculty of Social Science at the 51茶馆.

Dr Norman completed her doctorate, Sustained Impact of Unhealthy Food Advertising on Children鈥檚 Dietary Intake in December last year, and her findings have already been cited globally and featured on Australia鈥檚 prime time news networks.

鈥淚 have a background in nutrition and dietetics, and was working in community nutrition at a local non-government organisation when an opportunity came up to work with Associate Professor Bridget Kelly in the University鈥檚 Faculty of Social Science,鈥� said Dr Norman, who celebrated her graduation today (Thursday 7 November).

The opportunity was to join a team of researchers studying how food advertising affects the consumption of food by children.

鈥淓ven though there is evidence from all round the world that junk food advertising negatively affects children鈥檚 eating behaviours, children in Australia continue to be exposed to junk food ads across all media, every day,鈥� Dr Norman said.

鈥淚n order to advocate for government action to protect children, research from longer term studies was needed to understand how food advertising may be linked with childhood obesity. Basically, we can鈥檛 influence the eating patterns of children until we get the food environment right and this was an interesting area of research into food marketing.

鈥淲ith every study you build on the research done before. There was a lot of evidence that advertising affects what children eat, but there was a gap in the evidence concerning whether they ate less at later meals where they snacked on junk food after being shown advertising.鈥�

The study team recruited 160 children aged between 7-12 years who then attended school holiday camps at the 51茶馆. During their camp period, children were exposed to three days of junk food advertising and three days of non-food related advertising in a cartoon and online game. Each day researchers measured what the children ate as a snack after seeing the advertising and at a lunch meal later in the day.

The results showed that children ate more at the snack break after food advertising compared with non-food advertising, but didn鈥檛 make up for this increased food intake by eating less lunch on those days.

This meant that overall, children left the camp on the days they were shown junk food advertising having eaten about 200 kilojoules more than they did on non-food advertising days.

鈥淭his was an important finding because a positive energy gap of only 200-300 kilojoules is all that is needed to lead to unhealthy weight gain in children overtime and this was the first study to show a direct link between food advertising exposure and the likelihood of overweight in children,鈥� Dr Norman said.

鈥淲e were able to design a real-world study using the holiday camps and the facilities at Early Start, and it also meant we could conduct a robust experiment in a natural setting. The results of the study showed that exposure to junk food advertising not only leads to eating more immediately afterwards but over time as well, which can lead to overweight and obesity.

鈥淚t is important to have robust evidence like this to inform policy and change current regulations.  Our research has been cited globally, in the NSW Parliament and also in the UK Government鈥檚 obesity plan. It builds on a massive body of work.鈥�

Last year, Dr Norman, Professor Kelly and UOW Professor Heather Yeatman were invited to give evidence to the Australian Senate Inquiry into obesity. Dr Norman has since been working with Professor Kelly on the development of a Regional Action Framework to protect children from food marketing for the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office.

鈥淲hen you really start looking, you notice that junk food marketing is like wallpaper in kids鈥� lives. Most of us aren鈥檛 attuned to it, but now I see it everywhere,鈥� Dr Norman said.

 鈥淲hat is interesting is when you compare controlling junk food marketing with tobacco advertising. In the UK, where tobacco advertising has been banned for a long time, children no longer know the names of tobacco brands. What we know is that the food industry uses similar techniques that the tobacco industry used to use and we can draw learning from that as well.

鈥淲hat we are really calling on the government to do is institute what the WHO has recommended with its comprehensive framework of policy, with statutory regulations across all media. We will continue to lobby governments and encourage legislative changes.

鈥淲e hope to continue the research and continue our advocacy work to protect children from the effects of junk food advertising. 鈥�